Process.gov will be in Washington DC on April 14&15. As the name implies, it is an event aimed at the public and public sector in helping to spread good information about process technologies. What is entirely new this year is a track on Adaptive Case Management and the launch celebration for the book: “Mastering the Unpredictable“. Continue reading
There might be three distinct kinds of process support necessary:
1) System Centric Processes
2) Human Centric Processes
3) Knowledge Worker Processes Continue reading
A few weeks ago I became aware of Process Wiki (http://wiki.process.io/) when the founder of the wiki left a comment on one of my blog posts. I was curious. Without surprise, the wiki site contains a good collection of example business processes. You can join to be a member, and collaborate either by contributing more process examples, or by commenting on the existing ones. Processes can be uploaded & downloaded as XPDL files, and the site has a converter to visualize the processes as BPMN diagrams. Most sites have GIF files embedded in the page, but this is the first I have seen that you simply upload the XPDL file and it provides the visualization directly in the page. Continue reading
I decided to change the title of this blog, and I figured it worth a small note to explain why.
I started the blog three years ago as an experiment. I had a few things to say, but no idea if I would take the time to put them down, and even less of an idea whether anyone would care. Upon reflection, I am satisfied with that step. The blog has been more rewarding than I expected. Continue reading
Three upcoming events might be worth looking into:
This is a free webinar by Robert Shapiro the brain behind XPDL. Few have his insight and experience into the process space. Now a consultant at Process Analytica he brings a vendor independent view to the future of BPM and workflow standards. This will not be a presentation for the timid — expect considerable depth and details. If you are a software vendor thinking about implementing BPMN 2.0 or if you are a consultant that needs to keep up on BPM trends this briefing will be an easy way to get tips to help you plot your way forward.
June 18-19: The BPM in Government Event
There has been a big focus on BPM in the government this year, with the DoD sponsored SOA Symposium in DC in April, and now the Process.gov event in June, also in Washington DC. No coincidence that the 2009 BPM & Workflow Handbook has the theme Spotlight on BPM in Government. Most important:
The only event of its kind, Process.gov is strictly non-commercial and no paid-for sessions or sponsored content will be presented. All sessions and presenters are peer-reviewed and subject to a rigorous jury process.
I will be presenting a session on “Model Preserving Strategy” which is also the subject of my chapter in the 2009 Handbook. It is a great opportunity to have face-to-face meetings with many process thought leaders. Price is a very modest $100, but note: if you are not a government employee sign up early: there are a limited number of non-government admissions. As of this moment, there are a few open speaking slots as well (six I believe).
June 22: Stevens BPM Day
This is the third year for this vendor-independent executive seminar (pdf brochure) located conveniently just across the Hudson River from New York City hosted by Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken NJ. I will be there with a few other though leaders presenting the acclaimed “BPM in Practice” full day tutorial on currently evolving BPM technology and standards. Stevens adds an additional twist with a breakout track focusing on BPMN modeling. Robert Shapiro will surely have lots of interesting details on the BPMN 2.0 standard. Early registration is $495 but you save $100 if you are a WfMC member.
For you who read this blog on occasion, please help. I am looking for any valid BPMN diagrams that can not be represented as standard XPDL. Many people understand that XPDL is a superset of BPMN, meaning that everything from BPMN can be represented as XPDL, while the converse is not necessarily true. There are, however, a few vocal opponents who claim that XPDL can not be used to store BPMN.
OK. Both BPMN and XPDL are complex subjects. Continue reading
A business process is compsed of activities. Are those activities of a computer (an automating diagram) or are those activities of people (a facilitating diagram)? There are places for both kinds of diagrams in making organizations run better, and BPMN is a notation designed to support both as well. To support facilitation diagrams well, there is one key thing that is missing: a way to denote a “choice“. Continue reading
WfMC announced last week the BPMN Model Portability Validation test. This is a test that certifies that a BPM diagram, of a specified complexity, can be accurately exchanged between tools that have passed the test.
The test starts with a diagram that incorporates all the required BPMN elements. Continue reading
A process design ecosystem demands a reliable way to transfer the process definitions between tools. Bruce Silver’s post on Model Portability in BPMN 2.0 is very timely indeed. What he demonstrates is four different modeling tools, drawing BPMN diagrams, writing the diagram as XPDL, and then reading those into Sketch Pad (an open source process modeler) and displaying the result. Continue reading
Bruce Silver’s latest post “Reframing the BPMN vs BPEL Debate” calls to question whether it is worth continued discussion of the definition of BPM. Like most of Bruce’s posts, it is insightful and well worth reading. This is in response to a post by Boris Lublinsky on “BPEL: Who Needs It Anyway?”
I am a little surprised by Bruce’s response, Continue reading